This argument is hypocritical. In the first 2 sentences, you contradict yourself. Pain is pain, regardless for how long. A constant physical hurting and a 2 second hurting is still pain. I'm beginning to think you may believe pain requires a minimum amount of time for your argument to be true. However, due to definitions in the dictionary:

"physical suffering or distress, as due to injury, illness, etc. "

There is no involvement of time, so the first lines are dismissed.

The next line: "But in the long run it will hurt no one but the mother" is another contradiction. First you say it will hurt nobody then you say it will only hurt the mother. The mother is not nobody. This line is dismissed.

Later, you stated:

"No i didnt. As long as it doesnt hurt SOMEONE ELSE its fine. So the person making the decision will of course have to live with it cause its up to her. And you cant possibly say that it will hurt her, unless she feels shes made the wrong decision and thats her problem, so it shouldnt be illegal. "

Unfortunately, this is a different argument. You clearly stated before that it "won't hurt the 'baby' at all", and now you say "As long as it doesnt hurt SOMEONE ELSE its fine". These are 2 seperate arguments.

For this second argument, I don't follow your train of thought. It seems you're suggesting that because it isn't painful for the mother (unless she made the wrong decision but let's assume she didn't), then it is legal. Seems to me as though anything without pain is legal, so make abortion legal. Hold on, in your other argument you stated the fetus does experience pain, so it should be illegal. This makes no sense.

And then this: "eitherway i know my feelings on this are logical. its common sence". This just made me laugh. Thanks for the new signature by the way, xdreaxbabyx.

-------
"eitherway i know my feelings on this are logical
. its common sence" - xdreaxbabyx.