LiveWire Network Peer Answers Peer Support Teen Forums Tech Forums College Forums 350 users online 192103 members 185 active today Advertise Here Sign In
TeenCollegeTechPhotos | Quizzes | LiveSecret | Dictionary | News | FAQ
You have 1 new message.
Emergency Help
Until you sign up you can't do much. Yes, it's free.

Sign Up Now
Membername:
Password:
Already have an account?
Invite Friends
Active Members
Groups
Contests
Moderators
4 online / 24 MPM
Fresh Topics
  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic

Evolutionist AKA Are We Apes?
Replies: 38Last Post Oct. 21, 2008 5:05pm by ElephantStone
Welcome to LiveWire!
We're Stronger Together.
Join the Community
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite
ElephantStone


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
AllSmiles:

We are not descended from Apes. Like your quote says we are in a super family that includes apes, which goes as far back as gibbons. We are on a different line to apes.

Hominoidea is very, very large tree. And is rarely used in discussions of origins of humans due to that.

We (homo-sapiens) are completly seperate to apes.

Actually heres an evolution diagram to show you:

See, apes are on a completely different branch of the tree. We cannot be descended from them.

Post edited at 6:14 am on Oct. 20, 2008 by ElephantStone

-------

Future. Sex. Love. Sound.
Just tell me which way you like it.


6:10 am on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 389 Days Active
Join to learn more about ElephantStone Ireland | Straight Male | 6546 Posts | 10497 Points
allsmiles


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
Shall I try and put it simply? Ape is a synonym for homonidea. This discussion is a discussion about apes and thus about homonidea - its frequency of use in the discussion of the origins of human life is almost completely irrelevant. For the record, you can't just say "many scientists agree with me" without citing "many scientists." Until you do, I'll just say that even more agree with me.

-------
When they leave me, they're all smiles.
When they leave you, they're in tears.

6:37 am on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 390 Days Active
Join to learn more about allsmiles England, United Kingdom | Male | 6745 Posts | 11659 Points
telomere13


Dairy Product Addict

Patron
Tech Support Leader
Reply
ElephantStone, you can't be serious.  We share a common ancestor with the group you think of as "apes" (i.e. we're not descended from them) but in reality we are apes, specifically, great apes.

The end.

-------
http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-yatapys-support-a.html


9:07 am on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined April 2005 | 1026 Days Active
Join to learn more about telomere13 Wisconsin, United States | Label Free Male | 4917 Posts | 25088 Points
ElephantStone


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
Well youre both wrong. And I believe the term is 'anthropologist' not scientist. Archaeology is not a science. And for the record I did cite an anthropologist. And I could site more, the list would be as long as my arm.

Youre both wrong. Not in one book have I ever read homidea referred to as hominidea. The internet tells a different story after typing in Ape, but sites such as Wikipedia spring up, which doesnt hold any ground, imo.

-------

Future. Sex. Love. Sound.
Just tell me which way you like it.


10:40 am on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 389 Days Active
Join to learn more about ElephantStone Ireland | Straight Male | 6546 Posts | 10497 Points
telomere13


Dairy Product Addict

Patron
Tech Support Leader
Reply
Unfortunately, "homidea" doesn't even exist (nor, by the way, does "homidae" which I assume you were trying to spell). You can't just say I'm wrong without backing it up, at all.

Also, your chart doesn't show apes "on a completely seperate branch" at all, in fact, it shows that we are apes.

On the chart you posted at the top of the page, circle what you think are apes, so I at least know what you're talking about, because right now, I don't even know what you're looking at.

Post edited at 1:22 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 by telomere13

-------
http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-yatapys-support-a.html


1:20 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined April 2005 | 1026 Days Active
Join to learn more about telomere13 Wisconsin, United States | Label Free Male | 4917 Posts | 25088 Points
ElephantStone


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
Right, this is my last comment on this argument.

The only apes on that diagram are hylobates lar and pongo pygaemus. Coming from a species further back in the table.

I mean, perhaps in greater context we are apes if you are swearing homonidea is 'great ape' (which I ma still looking for in my texts), but we are not descended from apes.

David Lewis-Williams, University of Witwatersrand,:

   


Humans did not come from apes. No qualified person in the scientific community has ever made that claim, including Darwin. All apes and humans are desceneded from a single proto-ape species that lived millions of years ago nd no longer exists. Thus humans can be said to be closely related to the other apes, but we are ncertainly not descended from them.


-------

Future. Sex. Love. Sound.
Just tell me which way you like it.

2:08 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 389 Days Active
Join to learn more about ElephantStone Ireland | Straight Male | 6546 Posts | 10497 Points
telomere13


Dairy Product Addict

Patron
Tech Support Leader
Reply
Quote: from ElephantStone at 5:08 pm on Oct. 20, 2008

Right, this is my last comment on this argument.

The only apes on that diagram are hylobates lar and pongo pygaemus. Coming from a species further back in the table.


So gorillas and chimpanzees aren't apes, but orangutans are?  That really doesn't make any sense, at all, because all three of those (in addition, of course, to humans) are great apes.


I mean, perhaps in greater context we are apes if you are swearing homonidea is 'great ape' (which I ma still looking for in my texts)(...)

This is correct.


(...)but we are not descended from apes.

And I never said that we were.

-------
http://www.golivewire.com/forums/peer-yatapys-support-a.html


2:20 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined April 2005 | 1026 Days Active
Join to learn more about telomere13 Wisconsin, United States | Label Free Male | 4917 Posts | 25088 Points
medjai



Patron
Support Leader
Reply
Apes (at least not the standard conception of them) aren't even our closest relative living animal relative. This black box guy fails on so many levels and merely played on ignorance to make some money.

Post edited at 3:21 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 by medjai

-------
Who dares wins. - Special Air Service


3:21 pm on Oct. 20, 2008 | Joined Nov. 2003 | 1360 Days Active
Join to learn more about medjai California, United States | Straight Male | 13448 Posts | 34220 Points
ElephantStone


Soothsayer

Patron
Reply
This might keep everyone happy:


The best explanation I've found states in a nutshell that the term ape is sometimes employed to include all species in the superfamily Hominoidea (chimps, gorillas, orangutans, gibbons and humans) and sometimes to only include the nonhuman species, although traditionally, usage of the word has often not included humans. Therefore, I am completely correct when I state that humans are apes. However, those who argue against me and say that humans are not apes are just as correct.

Kevin Greene, 2007, Archaeology: An Introduction

-------

Future. Sex. Love. Sound.
Just tell me which way you like it.


5:05 pm on Oct. 21, 2008 | Joined Aug. 2007 | 389 Days Active
Join to learn more about ElephantStone Ireland | Straight Male | 6546 Posts | 10497 Points
Pages: 1 2 3 Email Print Favorite

Quick Reply

Prereq. Intellectual Test
You are signed in as our guest.

Looking for something else?
 

  LiveWire / Teen Forums / The Intellectual Forum / Viewing Topic